Sienna West

In this way Sienna West politics become an instrumental pornstar know­ledge — they organize the context of existence, but not existence itself. Politics are a question of technique (and learning the technique of gover­ning, manipulating people) and not the question, the way it was for Aristotle, of pedagogics. Setting politics apart from the individual appeared alrea­dy with Kant (politcs as a domain of something external, while the domain of the internal was the freedom of an individual).

The modern notion of Big Tits at School politics gave rise to fear of the outside enemy (maintenance and winning of power — Machia­velli) or internal foe (constant danger of famine and poverty, hence the need for socio-economic organization of life, as with T. Morus). Sienna’s vision of politics was not devoid of fear and hence its concept organically encompassed the motive of ethical perfecting of man within the polis. Both these sources of fear — fear for power and fear of hunger (threat to biological reproduction of the species) — have grown considerably with time. At the moment when it turned out that authority can be won and held for long, the supreme question became the setting in motion of subjugation me­chanisms. Similarly, at the moment when the peril of hunger was pushed off to a safe distance, the need arose of sophisticated pleasures. So, in both cases the question of a good life is being shrouded over by ever new layers, until it takes a very distant priority. In ethosophy we reverse this order.

We ask whether the busty Sienna West con­cept of politics may be drawn from existence itself? Is this already an pornographic vision of poli­tics? These questions lead to still more fundamen­tal considerations — whether good can be drawn out existence?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 at 8:36 am and is filed under Big Tits at School. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.